<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rails: Black Box Testing Complex Models</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mendable.com/rails-black-box-testing-complex-models/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mendable.com/rails-black-box-testing-complex-models/</link>
	<description>Mendable.com - Essential Reading for Ruby on Rails Developers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 07:26:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Thibaud Guillaume-Gentil</title>
		<link>http://www.mendable.com/rails-black-box-testing-complex-models/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Thibaud Guillaume-Gentil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 21:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mendable.com/?p=57#comment-30</guid>
		<description>Seems interesting, but I think I&#039;m prefer Cucumber and Scenario Outline like Joseph.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems interesting, but I think I&#8217;m prefer Cucumber and Scenario Outline like Joseph.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2009-07-11 &#124; NeXt</title>
		<link>http://www.mendable.com/rails-black-box-testing-complex-models/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2009-07-11 &#124; NeXt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 14:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mendable.com/?p=57#comment-27</guid>
		<description>[...] Rails: Black Box Testing Complex Models &#124; Ruby On Rails Blog (tags: rails ruby testing test model) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Rails: Black Box Testing Complex Models | Ruby On Rails Blog (tags: rails ruby testing test model) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ennuyer.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Rails Reading backlog</title>
		<link>http://www.mendable.com/rails-black-box-testing-complex-models/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Ennuyer.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Rails Reading backlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 09:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mendable.com/?p=57#comment-26</guid>
		<description>[...]  Rails: Black Box Testing Complex Models &#124; Ruby On Rails Blog  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Rails: Black Box Testing Complex Models | Ruby On Rails Blog  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie Dyer</title>
		<link>http://www.mendable.com/rails-black-box-testing-complex-models/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Dyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 12:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mendable.com/?p=57#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Nice article, you could also use shoulda macros to achieve the same result and do away with all the yml files by using factories. This would produce more rubyish tests IMO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article, you could also use shoulda macros to achieve the same result and do away with all the yml files by using factories. This would produce more rubyish tests IMO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Vincent</title>
		<link>http://www.mendable.com/rails-black-box-testing-complex-models/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Vincent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 23:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mendable.com/?p=57#comment-16</guid>
		<description>This is a very interesting approach. In the past I have created Procs in my setup method(s) to handle highly repetitious testing, but this would cut the it down even more for extreme cases. Thanks for the insight, I will keep this in mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very interesting approach. In the past I have created Procs in my setup method(s) to handle highly repetitious testing, but this would cut the it down even more for extreme cases. Thanks for the insight, I will keep this in mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.mendable.com/rails-black-box-testing-complex-models/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 22:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mendable.com/?p=57#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Yes, that would work to some extent, and I have played with Cucumber in the past. Admittedly Cucumber is a useful system, and does solve some problems (I love the readability of the user-stories), however it does introduce it&#039;s own set of problems. 

As a general rule I prefer Ruby Test::Unit, I found Cucumber to be too flexible for me and it turned kind of messy after a while, whereas I really like the structured format of Test::Unit. Secondly, this was a purely Test::Unit project that I implemented this for, I am not in favor of having multiple testing solutions inside one project.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, that would work to some extent, and I have played with Cucumber in the past. Admittedly Cucumber is a useful system, and does solve some problems (I love the readability of the user-stories), however it does introduce it&#8217;s own set of problems. </p>
<p>As a general rule I prefer Ruby Test::Unit, I found Cucumber to be too flexible for me and it turned kind of messy after a while, whereas I really like the structured format of Test::Unit. Secondly, this was a purely Test::Unit project that I implemented this for, I am not in favor of having multiple testing solutions inside one project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph HALTER</title>
		<link>http://www.mendable.com/rails-black-box-testing-complex-models/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph HALTER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 15:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mendable.com/?p=57#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Or try cucumber and its wonderfully handy &quot;Scenario outlines&quot;, I&#039;m sure you&#039;ll never go back ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or try cucumber and its wonderfully handy &#8220;Scenario outlines&#8221;, I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ll never go back <img src='http://www.mendable.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: atmos</title>
		<link>http://www.mendable.com/rails-black-box-testing-complex-models/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>atmos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 00:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mendable.com/?p=57#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Yo, great article!  I think you&#039;d really like cucumber, have you played with that at all?  It addressed a lot of these concerns and can be used to test models as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yo, great article!  I think you&#8217;d really like cucumber, have you played with that at all?  It addressed a lot of these concerns and can be used to test models as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
